Several years ago I was invited to join an “Ask a Christian” panel on a college campus. It took place in the large programming space of a residence hall and was respectably attended. The idea was very open-ended: come ask a real, live Christian anything you’d want to ask a Christian about.
Two animated young women sat toward the back that night. I could tell by their demonstrative body-language and side talk following responses, they were skeptical. Then I saw one of their hands shoot up:
“How can you really believe there is a good and all-powerful God when there are so many terrible things in this world? Why would God make a world like this; full of so much suffering? If God is good and has all power, why doesn’t he do something about it?”
It was the exact type of question we hoped might come up, and yet sitting there, each of us glancing up and down the panel, it felt like being in a police lineup. Who would step forward, open their mouth and indict the faith? Both women leaned forward as the question crackled through the room. This young skeptic had probed directly to the credibility or incredibility of the Christian faith. She had probed to the heart of Advent.
We Christians give cataclysmic questions like this neat, philosophical names, so as to decrease if not defuse their charge. This one gets called “theodicy” – the conundrum of God (theo) and justice (dike), coined by the Renaissance French polymath Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. When faced with a question like this, one can lean back in one’s chair and say, “Ah, yes. The age-old question of theodicy.” In doing so, one firstly distantiates one’s self from the payload of the question and, secondly, insinuates the question to be easily answered.
In fact, the first panelist to respond began by saying, “We all must remember, these are merely logical questions.” (I remember him emphasizing “merely.”) He continued, “They can be very emotional, but are satisfactorily answerable through logical reasoning.” He went on to answer their question through a thoroughly rationalistic framework which, I’ll admit, served as a rhetorical anodyne. Yet I watched the two women squirm during his answer and realized that I myself was squirming. Why? These are neither merely logical questions nor is there any ease in their answering. Advent asserts as much.
Continue reading “Advent II | Mighty God”