Racism II: Defined | #Friday500

[This is post is part of a five-part series. You can find a link to all five here.]

Let’s just cut to the chase, shall we? Whites mean something different than non-whites when they use the term “racism.” This effectively stalls one of the most needed of national conversations on the topic of race, because our semantics on the pivotal word are incongruent.

I’m going to use the terms “white” and “non-white” in a broad sort of way here. Firstly, I really mean most whites (the generality of the white community) and most non-whites. Secondly, blacks and indigenous Americans have the most direct and tragic history with the concept of race and racism in our nation, but the carryover onto every community of color has been enfolded into our nation’s cruelest legacy.

And while a mutually-understood employment of the term “racism” is critical toward any meaningful dialogue, it must be said up front: whites are wrong on this, and non-whites are right. Continue reading “Racism II: Defined | #Friday500”

For Your Consideration (04/26/17)

JaneAddams

THE JANE ADDAMS MODEL (DAVID BROOKS)

I would recommend David Brooks’  column in this week’s the New York Times lauding social work pioneer Jane Addams and holding her up as a paragon for our modern world.

Jane Addams was a forerunner of social work and social welfare. In response to the abject plight of immigrants in the near north neighborhoods of Chicago, she began what would become an extensive, city-wide network of centers. But it began with a work based out of her own home, which came to be known as The Hull-House.

Brooks describes a trip to Europe that inspired her vision:

In London, she visited a place called Toynbee Hall, a settlement house where rich university men organized social gatherings with the poor in the same way they would organize them with one another. Addams returned to Chicago and set up Hull House, an American version of the settlement idea.

I walk past the Jane Addams Hull-House Museum at Halsted and Polk on the UIC campus many times each week, and was piqued to see Brook’s feature of Addams’ work there.

Her ability to constantly merge philosophy with action, and vice versa, was one of her defining qualities. Her aspiration was to kindle the dignity of those with whom she worked.

There were classes in acting, weaving, carpentry, but especially in art history, philosophy, and music. Addams was convinced that everyone longs for beauty and knowledge. Everyone longs to serve some high ideal. She believed in character before intellect, that spiritual support is as important as material support. And yet “the soul of man in the commercial and industrial struggle is under siege.”

I love the notion of fighting against the siege on the souls of men, and appreciate her human dignity-lifting ideals.

Her work would become a global model for how to work among the poor and disenfranchised, and I agree with Brooks that hers remains an important model for our world.

SEE YOURSELF IN OTHERS (TRIBECA FILM FEST)

The Tribeca Film Festival released a short film called “See Yourself in Others”. They involved people from many walks of life, and sent them onto the streets of New York with a five-sided mirror helmet (one which allowed passers-by to see their own reflections atop the body of the wearer, but also allowed the wearer to observe their responses).

It is meant as a provocative celebration of empathy. Curbed NY ran a feature on the piece, which was created in conjunction with DDB New York:

In a statement, Icaro Doria, the chief creative officer of DDB New York (which conceptualized the film along with Tribeca), said that “Stories put us in unfamiliar or uncomfortable situations and force us to confront other points of view.… More than ever, we need these stories and we need this empathy. Because we need each other.”

Initiatives like this only accomplish so much, but any effort to inject empathy into our nation’s bloodstream is welcome.

This resembles the message of my values post:

Currency exchange is probably a fitting allegory we might adopt. The shapes, sizes and hues of values all have their basis and environ of worth. Values are foreign currencies, but currency nonetheless. Would we learn their purchase by going abroad from our insular worlds in whatever ways we might?

RESOURCES ON RACE & RACISM

I intend to follow up my recent post on racism and race with 2-3 more, but, in the meantime, I wanted to recommend a few resources that might help expand on my thinking for those of you who are interested.

On Friday, I offered the following:

We need to be having an important national conversation about race, but the incongruence of our vocabularies render this virtually impossible.

As with all conversations, meaning is irreducibly critical. When meaning is not mutually shared or at least understood, dialogue will always degenerate.

Whites and non-whites mean different things by the word racism, and until this gets more broadly sorted out communication on the topic is fraught with discord.

  • THE LITURGIST PODCAST (BLACK & WHITE: RACISM IN AMERICA) – Hosts Michael Gungor and Science Mike welcome rapper and Propaganda and musician William Matthews on their show to have a fairly elucidating conversation about race and racism in America and in the American church. Pretty pointed.
  • WASHINGTON POST (1992) – As I began my initial search for resources on this topic, I was amazed at how few media outlets were addressing the obvious semantic incongruence between whites and blacks regarding the meaning of the word “racism”. The only article I found that was addressing it head on came from a post-Rodney King verdict article in the Washington Post—in 1992! Isn’t that insane! Here it is.
  • RACE: THE POWER OF AN ILLUSION (PBS) – Back in 2003 (14 years ago), PBS release a 3 part series on race and racism called “Race: the Power of an Illusion”. It feels dated, but it is one of the better options out there for understanding the topic of race. I can’t find episodes 2 and 3, but here’s the first installment. It’s about 1 hour long.
  • VOX (THE MYTH OF RACE DEBUNKED) – If you don’t have an hour, here is a brief video released by the site VOX on the topic. It’s 3 minutes, so pardon the overweening promise. Also, pardon the pretty weak narration. It isn’t always a good idea to have the author do the reading (IMO).  It is a good primer, though. Here’s the video:

 

 

Let America Be America Again (Langston Hughes)

LangstonHughes

In October of 1859, the abolitionist John Brown led a band of 22 men on a raid of Harper’s Ferry, Virginia (now WV). There was a government arsenal housed there, and Brown had hoped to arm slaves and abolitionists in a sweeping battle of southern slave liberation.

They succeeded in seizing the town, but were quickly pinned down and suppressed by Marines under the command of Robert E. Lee.

Brown was arrested, and, several weeks later, hanged for treason. His life was a spectral portent of our nation’s imminent collapse into civil conflict and prompted Henry David Thoreau to pen the following:

Some eighteen hundred years ago Christ was crucified; this morning, perchance, Captain Brown was hung. These are the two ends of a chain which is not without its links. He is not Old Brown any longer; he is an angel of light.

The poem, “John Brown’s Body” became a Union marching hymn.

A free black man named Lewis Sheridan Leary was one of the men who lost their life under Brown’s command during the ill-fated raid. His widow Mary would later remarry Charles Langston. Their daughter Caroline would then have a son, and he would receive her maiden name as one of his two middle names. His full name was James Mercer Langston Hughes. The world would know him as the famed Harlem Renaissance poet Langston Hughes.

Hughes was born in Joplin, MO, but lived most of his childhood in Lawrence, KS. In early adulthood he lived everywhere: Mexico, France, England, Chicago. He died in New York City in 1967 at the age of 65.

He was a proponent of the embrace of black identity and of a clear eyed view of our complicated national story.

Nowhere is the latter more ringing than in his poem, “Let America Be America Again.” I think you’ll find its theme very timely; both searching and amazingly resilient its longings.

Here it is.

Let America Be America Again

by Langston Hughes

Let America be America again.
Let it be the dream it used to be.
Let it be the pioneer on the plain
Seeking a home where he himself is free.

(America never was America to me.)

Let America be the dream the dreamers dreamed—
Let it be that great strong land of love
Where never kings connive nor tyrants scheme
That any man be crushed by one above.

(It never was America to me.)

O, let my land be a land where Liberty
Is crowned with no false patriotic wreath,
But opportunity is real, and life is free,
Equality is in the air we breathe.

(There’s never been equality for me,
Nor freedom in this “homeland of the free.”)

Say, who are you that mumbles in the dark?
And who are you that draws your veil across the stars?

I am the poor white, fooled and pushed apart,
I am the Negro bearing slavery’s scars.
I am the red man driven from the land,
I am the immigrant clutching the hope I seek—
And finding only the same old stupid plan
Of dog eat dog, of mighty crush the weak.

I am the young man, full of strength and hope,
Tangled in that ancient endless chain
Of profit, power, gain, of grab the land!
Of grab the gold! Of grab the ways of satisfying need!
Of work the men! Of take the pay!
Of owning everything for one’s own greed!

I am the farmer, bondsman to the soil.
I am the worker sold to the machine.
I am the Negro, servant to you all.
I am the people, humble, hungry, mean—
Hungry yet today despite the dream.
Beaten yet today—O, Pioneers!
I am the man who never got ahead,
The poorest worker bartered through the years.

Yet I’m the one who dreamt our basic dream
In the Old World while still a serf of kings,
Who dreamt a dream so strong, so brave, so true,
That even yet its mighty daring sings
In every brick and stone, in every furrow turned
That’s made America the land it has become.
O, I’m the man who sailed those early seas
In search of what I meant to be my home—
For I’m the one who left dark Ireland’s shore,
And Poland’s plain, and England’s grassy lea,
And torn from Black Africa’s strand I came
To build a “homeland of the free.”

The free?

Who said the free? Not me?
Surely not me? The millions on relief today?
The millions shot down when we strike?
The millions who have nothing for our pay?
For all the dreams we’ve dreamed
And all the songs we’ve sung
And all the hopes we’ve held
And all the flags we’ve hung,
The millions who have nothing for our pay—
Except the dream that’s almost dead today.

O, let America be America again—
The land that never has been yet—
And yet must be—the land where every man is free.
The land that’s mine—the poor man’s, Indian’s, Negro’s, ME—
Who made America,
Whose sweat and blood, whose faith and pain,
Whose hand at the foundry, whose plow in the rain,
Must bring back our mighty dream again.

Sure, call me any ugly name you choose—
The steel of freedom does not stain.
From those who live like leeches on the people’s lives,
We must take back our land again,
America!

O, yes,
I say it plain,
America never was America to me,
And yet I swear this oath—
America will be!

Out of the rack and ruin of our gangster death,
The rape and rot of graft, and stealth, and lies,
We, the people, must redeem
The land, the mines, the plants, the rivers.
The mountains and the endless plain—
All, all the stretch of these great green states—
And make America again!

Racism I: Race | #Friday500

[This is post is part of a five-part series. You can find a link to all five here.]

There’s a very important but under-talked-about topic in our country, and it has to do with vocabulary of race and racism. Specifically, the incongruence between the usage and understanding of these terms between most white and non-white communities.

We need to be having an important national conversation about race, but the incongruence of our vocabularies render this virtually impossible.

As with all conversations, meaning is irreducibly critical. When meaning is not mutually shared or at least understood, dialogue will always degenerate.

Whites and non-whites mean different things by the word racism, and until this gets more broadly sorted out communication on the topic is fraught with discord. This crops up so often in main stream media and everyday conversations, that I can’t believe it isn’t constantly being clarified! It’s one of the least addressed semantic landmines out there.

Flannery O’Conner once said:

I write because I don’t know what I think until I read what I say.

I’ve tried to be pretty forthright that the things I’ve been posting are, in part, my own efforts to write in such a way as to “know what I think.” This topic may be the truest example of this, because, full disclosure, I myself had no awareness of this semantic incongruity until very recently.

My working definition of racism has always resembled this: Treating people differently based on their race.

This is the way whites commonly define racism: personal or situational incidents in which race becomes a criteria for our treatment—positive or negative—of others.

This is patently not the way a non-white would encapsulate the idea of racism.

But we can’t move this forward until we understand the term “race”.  Continue reading “Racism I: Race | #Friday500”

For Your Consideration (04/19/17)

SEXISM IN SILICON VALLEY (THE ATLANTIC)

I was traveling on the day I published my Billy Graham Rule post and grabbed the latest copy of The Atlantic (I consider it to be one of the last great magazines). I was intrigued to see the cover issue addressing a related issue, posing the question, “Why is Silicon Valley so Awful to Women?” by Liza Mundy.

For such a liberal and forward oriented industry, it would seem that tech is still very inhospitable to women. How so?

Susan Wu, an entrepreneur and investor, says that when she was teaching herself to code as a teenager, she was too naive to perceive the sexism of internet culture.

But as she advanced in her career and moved into investing and big-money venture capitalism, she came to see the elaborate jiu-jitsu it takes for a woman to hold her own.

At one party, the founder of a start-up told Wu she’d need to spend “intimate time” with him to get in on his deal. An angel investor leading a different deal told her something similar. She became a master of warm, but firm, self-extrication.

How ugly is this? What a backward set of skills we expect of such talented women!

The article goes on,

A report by the Center for Talent Innovation found that when women drop out of tech, it’s usually not for family reasons. Nor do they drop out because they dislike the work—to the contrary, they enjoy it and in many cases take new jobs in sectors where they can use their technical skills. Rather, the report concludes that “workplace conditions, a lack of access to key creative roles, and a sense of feeling stalled in one’s career” are the main reasons women leave. “Undermining behavior from managers” is a major factor.

Our nation is fumbling through many things right now, but degradation of women is certainly one of the items at the forefront.

The battle of the sexes is a human issue immemorial. It’s so morbidly fascinating that even in such a modern and liberalized setting as Silicon Valley, men are still so prone to devolution, isn’t it? Continue reading “For Your Consideration (04/19/17)”

Sport as Signal

On April 15, 1947 Jackie Robinson played his first Major League game. He started at first base and batted second in the lineup. He scored the winning run that day, but that was only a sheen on what he’d truly achieved; what was being achieved through this 28-year-old man.

Robinson was the first black player permitted to play in the modern Major Leagues.

That was only 70 year ago. Many who were there still live to tell about it.

I really love sports. And I’m always interrogating myself as to what that means—whether it’s a good thing or bad. Sports is really only entertainment, yet it occupies a special cultural space in societies far and wide. It can be an amniocentesis of culture and of the composition of societal values. In this regard, it must be seen as far more than mere entertainment. Continue reading “Sport as Signal”

Values | #Friday500

I’ve been thinking a lot about the topic of values since the last election, and the role they play in our national social, cultural, political conversation.

My teenage years were spent in Colorado Springs, during the 1990s high-momentum days of the Religious Right. Focus on the Family had just relocated to my town, Promise Keepers was filling more and more stadiums with fervent Christian men and tensions over values were palpable. I attended a Promise Keepers event in Boulder, Colorado in 1994, where planes flew over-head trailing scornful messages behind: “Smart Women Don’t Believe Your Promises!” read one; “Promise Keepers: Losers Weepers” another. Local residents would honk their horns and flash the finger while we walked back to our cars. I was just happy to be one of the good guys!

Nixon’s “silent majority” had morphed into Falwell’s Moral Majority, and now James Dobson & Co. were stepping in the ring—the gloves were coming off for those with values!

Of course this only galvanized those on the left to plant their own flag in the territory of values, and I recall the many Volvos and VWs tooling about town with bumper stickers like “Focus on Your Own Damn Family” ($1.50 on Amazon) and “Hate is Note a Family Value”. (There’s a sociology term paper titled “On Liberal Messaging” tucked in here somewhere.)

The decay of the nuclear family was bemoaned as our primary national ill. Then someone named Hillary Clinton wrote a book called It Takes a Villageand conservatives went apoplectic, “Don’t you dare!”

The idea of values had been beat from plowshare into sword, and was being swung with wild frenzy!

Even the Addams Family took up the cause! Things were getting weird.

Our nation became one big stadium chanting, “We’ve got values, yes we do! We’ve got values, how ’bout you?” back and forth.

It all died down eventually—or at least the term “values” got stretched indistinguishably shapeless—but the attitude had merely gone subterranean, like one of those giant worms from Tremors (among the finest of Reba McEntire films). And yet it surfaces still; hungry for more.

So lets settle this once for all: who has values? Continue reading “Values | #Friday500”

For Your Consideration (04/12/17)

stownmaze

CAN JOHN B.’S MAZE BE SAVED?

Having just concluded S-Town—that latest specimen of the meteoric podcast—I can assure you I am still ingesting the carcass of its moral. I’ll probably be ready to offer something cogent next week. Or not.

But for now, I happened upon this article by Cory Scarola from the (kinda cool, kinda geeky) site Inverse Culture detailing just how challenging it might prove for fans of the podcast to enact the salvation of John B. McLemore’s Woodstock, Alabama maze. (Even harder than enacting his own salvation?)

I’m one of those people who don’t want anything meaningful to befall demise or even deterioration, but ours is a world ushered along by entropies of many varieties. Continue reading “For Your Consideration (04/12/17)”

The Billy Graham Rule

I’m a male. I’m a Christian. I’m a leader. I’m a male Christian leader, and I came of age in the long twilight shadows of “the Billy Graham rule.”

What is the Billy Graham Rule (BGR)? It was one of the principles formulated by the aforementioned traveling evangelist and his associates in 1948 during an outreach event in Modesto, CA. It constituted an effort to preserve their own integrity in the areas of finances, collaboration with churches, event reporting and, most famously, marital fidelity.

They called this document, the “Modesto Manifesto.”  The aspect garnering the most recent notice pertains to parameters regarding interaction with those of the opposite sex (in their case, females):

We all knew of evangelists who had fallen into immorality while separated from their families by travel. We pledged among ourselves to avoid any situation that would have even the appearance of compromise or suspicion. From that day on, I did not travel, meet or eat alone with a woman other than my wife.

This rule has been thrust unexpectedly into the national conversation after it was revealed that Vice President Mike Pence himself subscribes to an iteration of it.

This tempest in a teapot has up-swelled a veritable pandemonium of responses! (Just Google “Billy Graham Rule.”) Commentators have scrutinized this principle from every conceivable angle; defending, ridiculing, questioning its legality and even conflating it with misogyny and the promotion of “rape culture”—met in turn with recriminating charges of hypocrisy!

Personally, this has occasioned the opportunity for me to reflect on my own history with this rule. I’ll share it with you here.

Continue reading “The Billy Graham Rule”

For Your Consideration (04/05/17)

Trump Housing Bloc

FRIEDRICH TRUMP (THE NEW YORKER)

On October 19, 1885 the S.S. Eider completed its 12 day journey from Bremen, Germany and entered New York Harbor.

Aboard that ship was a sixteen-year-old barber’s apprentice named Friedrich Trumpf; our current president’s grandfather.

Ted Widmer of The New Yorker wrote this perceptive little profile of Trump (the F was dropped shortly thereafter) and the US immigration context into which he was thrust.

There is a subtext, but it doesn’t read like a polemic. You’ll probably appreciated it.

He writes,

On the day the S.S. Eider arrived, New York’s many newspapers advertised their headlines to passersby. The Times tried to cloak its news with a veneer of respectability, but the sounds of the street could still be heard through the newsprint. In Ohio, Democrats were decrying “technical and stupid blunders” in a local election. In Terre Haute, Indiana, a “bold real estate operator” was “dodging the law officers and leaving heavy debts behind him.” In Elmira, New York, a “rich farmer” was swindled by two “wealthy appearing men” who purported to be building a mill.

Somehow I can’t help thinking that if we can become better at humanizing one another (of which heritage appreciation plays a role), our nation could limp forward.

Let’s keep giving it our best. Continue reading “For Your Consideration (04/05/17)”